Iceland Consortium and Karger Publisher have signed Open Access Agreeement

The contract provides access to all Karger e-journals (including backfiles) and enables OA publishing with no additional cost to authors. 

This transformative agreement is valid for 2021-2023 and includes access to the Karger eJournal Collection as well as unlimited publication for all Icelandic corresponding authors.

Media Release 

Submitting your Paper to a Karger Journal

The transformative agreement


The agreement also includes access to the KargerLEARN platform with more than 15 available courses which cover all aspects of academic publishing.

Instructions for signing in KargerLEARN



National access to Ebsco Premier collections stops at the end of 2020

Subscription for the Ebsco Premier was not renewed for 2021 and is not longer in the national access.

It may happen that some journals in Ebsco Premier collections are accessable in ProQuest Central, which continues to be in the national access.


Nordic Consortia support LIBER’s Five Principles for Negotiations with Publishers

All Nordic consortia have signed the OA2020 “Expression of Interest in the Large-Scale Implementation of Open Access to Scholarly Journals”[1] and are working for a transition from a subscription-based scholarly journal model to an open access publishing model. The Association of European Research Libraries, LIBER, has published a strategy: “Five Principles for Negotiations with Publishers,”[2] which is in line with the mission of OA2020.

Nordic consortia would hereby like to endorse LIBER’s principles and aim to meet them in publisher negotiations. Nordic countries have different national open access strategies, and, consequently, the relevance of all LIBER’s principles may differ from country to country.

LIBER’s Five Principle for Negotiations with Publishers:

1. Licensing and Open Access go Hand-in-Hand
The world of subscription deals and APC-deals are closely linked. Nobody should pay for subscriptions and pay APCs at the same time (‘double dipping’). Each new license agreed on should therefore contain conditions about both sides of the coin. Increased spending on APCs should result in proportionately lower spending on subscription fees.

2. No Open Access, No Price Increase
There is enough money in the system already. Libraries have paid annual price increases of up to 8% for years, supposedly to allow publishers to innovate. A key feature of innovation for the research community is that research outputs are freely available. Therefore if an agreement with publishers on Open Access cannot be reached in our contracts, future price increases should not be accepted.

3. Transparency for Licensing Deals: No Non-Disclosure
The practices of libraries should fully reflect their commitment to Open Access. Licensing agreements should therefore be openly available. Society will not accept confidential agreements paid for with public money in the form of non-disclosure agreements, as recent developments in Finland and The Netherlands have shown.

4. Keep Access Sustainable
To avoid putting more money in the system, and to strengthen Open Access, some libraries have given up their rights to perpetual access in license agreement. Perpetual access is, however, critical in a quickly-changing publishing environment. Libraries must secure sustainable access to content.

5. Usage Reports Should Include Open Access
Although APC-buyouts are becoming more common, reporting about Open Access is still rare. Just as libraries receive reports about downloads and usage in the subscription world, they should also receive reports on Open Access publications. It is normal to receive insight into what we pay for.

Bibsam Consortium
Iceland Consortium